Comparison canon camera: Side-by-side camera comparison: Digital Photography Review : Digital Photography Review

Canon vs Nikon – Difference and Comparison

Reliability

According to a study by PC World, Canon cameras are considered particularly durable, with few problems occurring. Nikon’s are considered less durable, with an average reliability comparable to other digital camera brands. [1]

The following video offers a few tips on buying a DSLR camera:

Compatibility

Canon’s cameras and lenses produced since 1987 (known as EOS) are incompatible with those produced before 1987, but are all compatible with other cameras and lens produced since 1987 (with the notable exception of EF-S mount lenses, which are only compatible with Canon bodies with the APS-C cropped sensor) Canon APS-C bodies can use standard EF mount as well as EF-S mount lenses, but Canon full frame sensor bodies cannot use EF-S mount lenses. Canon cameras can also use Nikon lenses but this requires the use of an adapter.

Most Nikon SLR cameras and lenses are compatible with one another, especially those from the same window of 10-20 years. Nikon cameras cannot use Canon lenses.

Flash

Older Canon cameras do not have consistent flash performance, with exposure varying from frame to frame. However, the new Canon 5D mark III gives perfect flash exposure. Flash sync options are more difficult to set than on Nikons, as is manual flash mode.

Nikons all have perfect flash exposure, and more flash sync options that are easy to set. [2]

Most Canon cameras come with “C” modes, which record everything about a camera’s settings for future use.

Except for the Nikon D7000 and Nikon D600, Nikons do not have total-camera-state recall functions. They have “settings banks,” but they do not recall everything and cannot be locked.

Playback Data

Canon cameras show information on a photograph clearly, but will not show the millimeter setting of the lens. Canon cannot show a color YGRB histogram while zoomed in on a small area of the image.

Nikon offers all data on a photograph, but on several different screens. It allows the user to zoom into a small area and see that section’s color YRGB histogram.

Lens diaphragms

Canon used 6 or 8 bladed diaphragms up until 2012. These create inferior sunstars and more out-of-focus highlight blobs.

Nikon uses 7 or 9 bladed lens diaphragms, which create superior sunstars and less disruptive shapes.

Auto ISO

While both Canon and Nikon allow the user to select a shutter speed to increase the ISO based on lens focal length, only the Nikon allows the user to do so by a fixed amount.

Color and Tone

The two brands define colors and tones different, and use a different Auto White Balance. This means that pictures will always look slightly differently on one from the other.

Lens Corrections

Most Canon and Nikon DSLRs offer electronic lens correction for dark corners, lateral color fringes and distortion. Canons cannot correct distortion in-camera as shot, while Nikon cameras correct images as they are shot.

LCD Quality

Canon’s LCDs have the same 3:2 aspect ratio as the images, while Nikon use a different aspect ratio. Canon cameras have anti-reflection glass or plastic over their LCDs, while Nikons do not.

Autofocus

Since 2012, the two brands have had similar autofocus ability. Canon autofocus is a little faster with cheap lenses, and similar to Nikon with expensive ones.

Viewfinders

Canon DSLRs and point and shoots do not have viewfinder grids, while digital Nikons mostly do.

Data Embedding

Since 2012, Canons allow for data embedding in the camera, while previous models required the user to add the data using a computer.

Nikons allow the user to embed copyright, name and phone number into every photo.

Data Transfer

Photos on a Canon camera can only be read by a computer after installing special software.

Nikon photographs can be moved onto a computer without additional software.

JPG Quality

Canon JPG file sizes vary to allow for constant quality, depending on the detail in the photograph. Nikons do not do this, which can lower quality of some images.

Award Winning Products

Canon cameras have won many awards, including 5 Technical Image Press Association (TIPA) awards in 2012. These were for Best Professional DSLR Lens (Canon EF 8-15mm f/4L USM fisheye lens), Best Video Digital SLR (Canon EOS 5D Mark III), Best Professional Videocamera (Canon EOS C300 Digital Cinema Camera), Best Digital SLR Professional (Canon EOS-1D X), and Best Expert Compact Camera (Canon PowerShot G1 X).

A Canon EF 8-15 f/4L Fisheye USM lens

Canon EOS 5D Mark III

A Canon EOS C300

Canon EOS-1D X

Nikon won 2 TIPAs in 2012, including Best Digital SLR Entry Level (Nikon D5100) and Best Digitial SLR Expert (Nikon D800).

Nikon D5100

Nikon D800

Market Shares and Sales

In 2011, Canon had revenue of 3.557 trillion yen, with an operating income of 378.071 billion.

Nikon had revenue of 887.5 billion yen, with an operating income of 54. 1 billion.

Where to buy

Amazon.com is always a great place to buy cameras. Here are some relevant links:

  • DSLR camera best sellers on Amazon
  • Best selling camcorders on Amazon
  • Best selling point-and-shoot cameras on Amazon

References

  • Wikipedia: Canon Inc.
  • Wikipedia: Nikon

Which is Best in 2023?

When it comes to full frame cameras, it’s a Nikon vs Canon vs Sony debate. All three brands create excellent cameras and optics. So the tough question remains—how do you choose between them?

All three offer excellent cameras at every skill level. They have cameras for professionals and enthusiasts. And there are entry-level cameras for beginners.

But once you commit to one brand, switching becomes expensive. You need to swap lenses and flashes too. So choosing the right brand from the start is all the more important. To help you make that choice, we’ve compiled everything you need to know about Nikon, Canon, and Sony.

Helpful Training

Quick Capture Cheat Sheets

Trying to decide between Nikon vs Canon vs Sony? Our Cheat Sheets will help you master 52 different aspects of photography, making it easier to compare and choose the best brand for you.

Shop  Offers

Check price on 

Buy from 

Unavailable

[ExpertPhotography is supported by readers. Product links on ExpertPhotography are referral links. If you use one of these and buy something, we make a little bit of money. Need more info? See how it all works here.]

Nikon vs Canon vs Sony

Keep in mind that here we’re only comparing brands that offer extensive full frame options. With that said, let’s dive right in!

  1. Nikon
  2. Canon
  3. Sony

Nikon

Nikon has been developing optics since 1917 and launched their first camera in 1948. Nikon has been known for their reliable and high-performance DSLRs. But they have decided to discontinue developing SLR cameras.

Nikon has been most known for their DSLRs. They are instantly recognizable by the red swoop on the grips. And even though Nikon has stopped developing their DSLR lineup, they are still available on the market.

They have DSLR cameras for everyone, from beginners to professionals. And they also have a few bridge cameras (the popular superzooms) with a best-in-class zoom. But they’re now focused on expanding their mirrorless lineup.

Images from the latest Nikon cameras tend to have little noise, sharp subjects, and solid color. Even so, some say Nikon colors have a bit too much green and yellow.

Nikon also uses terms that can be easier for beginners to understand. Continuous autofocus is called “AF-C” instead of Canon’s “Al Servo.”

Their spot-metering modes also read the light at the focal point instead of only metering the light at the center of the image. This makes getting accurate exposure faster.

And Nikon’s long history means that there are also plenty of lenses to choose from. These cover the super-wide to the extreme telephoto. They also have great specialty lens ranges like macro and fisheye.

You can find any lens type in their F-mount series. Plus, Nikon also has a good selection of flashes and accessories. Nikon lenses tend to be priced higher than Canon. But a Nikon camera body is typically priced lower.

Nikon DSLR Cameras

Nikon’s priciest DSLR is the Nikon D6, with 20.8 MP (megapixels) and 14 fps continuous shooting. It’s a high-performance professional DSLR.

Nikon’s D850 is the most popular DSLR camera among professional photographers. It’s packed with advanced features. And the full frame sensor gives you a 45.7 MP image resolution. It’s a reliable workhorse that professionals love.

Lower numbers in the name mean fewer features. But the D610 is still a capable camera.

For APS-C cameras, Nikon offers a wide range. They have inexpensive beginner cameras to high-end, fast cameras.

The Nikon D3500 is widely considered to be the best camera for beginners. It has a 24.2 MP sensor. And it has fantastic guide modes for beginners. But it is one of the cameras Nikon has stopped making along with the D3300.

The Nikon D500 is the current flagship camera of the DX series. It has a 20.9 MP sensor and a 10 fps burst mode. It has sophisticated autofocus (AF) and excellent low-light performance. So it’s an ideal choice for sports and wildlife photographers.

The Nikon D7500 is another great option for beginners. It’s a great camera at a reasonable price. The Nikon D5600 offers a few more extras while maintaining a low price. Read our full review of the Nikon Z7500.

Nikon Mirrorless Cameras

Some of the best Nikon DSLR technology has migrated to their mirrorless cameras. Nikon was a bit late to the mirrorless party. But their Z series mirrorless range now has some excellent cameras.

The Nikon Z7 and Z7 II offer many of the favorite features of the brand’s DSLRs. And they add extras like image stabilization and more advanced AF features. Read our full review of the Nikon Z7.

The Nikon Z9 is their most complete mirrorless camera. It’s an upgrade from the Z7 II. And it’s a top-quality full frame mirrorless camera for professionals.

The Nikon Z50 and the newer, retro-looking Z fc have APS-C sensors. So they have compact and lightweight bodies. And their photo and video features make them strong hybrid cameras. They’re ideal for vloggers, influencers, and content creators.

Photographers will likely be very happy with a Nikon camera. Nikon offers solid image quality, an excellent build, fast performance, and plenty of accessories.

Some photographers prefer Canon’s color quality. So it may be a big deal if you’re inexperienced in color editing. But the terminology used by Nikon may be a bit simpler for beginners.

Canon

Canon dates back to the “Kwanon” 35mm camera in 1934. Today, Canon produces cameras in almost every category, including mirrorless and compacts. But like Nikon, they have also decided to discontinue the development of their DSLRs.

Canon’s DSLRs carry the EOS name. It stands for Electro Optical System. And their EOS film cameras in 1987 were the first fully electronic systems—lenses and bodies that communicated with each other. Read our review of their classic Canon AE-1 SLR.

Now the brand is known for both its high-end cameras and beginner options. And digital DSLR cameras continue the EOS name.

Many of the EOS bodies use a Dual Pixel autofocus system. This involves two halves of each pixel working together when autofocusing. It is a system that works well with both stills and video.

Canon also offers a wide selection of different EOS lens options with the EF mount and the EF-S mount. The latter is designed for the company’s APS-C DSLRs, which have a smaller sensor than a full frame.

Canon tends to have lower prices on lenses and higher prices on bodies when compared to Nikon and Sony.

Canon DSLR Cameras

Canon’s best and most expensive DSLR series is the EOS-1D line. The most recent model is the EOS-1D X Mark III. It has a 20 fps burst and a 20 MP full frame sensor. This series is a popular choice for professional wildlife and sports photography.

The next line of DSLRs is the EOS 5D series, like the 30.4 MP EOS 5D Mark IV. It’s a powerful full frame DSLR with excellent photo features. You can read our comparison between the 5D Mark III and Mark IV.

A cheaper full frame option is the EOS 6D line. This currently has two cameras—the 6D and the newer EOS 6D Mark II.

The only other line with a single-digit marking is the 7D series. The 7D series consists of Canon’s semi-professional crop-sensor cameras. This line also has two models—the original EOS 7D and the EOS 7D Mark II. Read our full review of the 7D Mark II.

Canon’s other APS-C DSLRs have a two-digit number, like the Canon EOS 80D. They also have the Canon EOS 90D. It has a powerful 32.5 MP sensor. And the video features are some of the best in any DSLR camera.

Canon Rebels are the brand’s most affordable options. These are excellent for beginners. The Canon EOS Rebel T8i is their best entry-level DSLR. The 24.1 MP image resolution gives you beautiful images. And you also get 4K video recording.

Canon Mirrorless Cameras

While Canon is more known for DSLRs, the company has excellent mirrorless options too. Their mirrorless cameras are some of the most popular and advanced on the market.

The EOS M line is a series of mirrorless cameras with an APS-C sensor. The Canon EOS M50 Mark II is a fine example.

The M50’s mirrorless body is compact and lightweight. And it has excellent features for photography and video. So it’s a great choice for vloggers and content creators.

Canon has been quite slow with stepping into the full frame mirrorless world. And their lineup is still very limited.

The Canon EOS R5 C is one of their best mirrorless cameras. Its powerful full frame sensor gives you incredible 45 MP images. And perhaps even more impressive is the 8K video capabilities.

It’s a pure hybrid camera. And it’s a brilliant investment for professional multimedia makers.

The Canon EOS R8 is another mirrorless beast. It doesn’t have the 8K video of the R5 C. But it’s another example of Canon pushing the boundaries with its mirrorless camera range.

The bottom line? Canon is an excellent brand that many photographers trust. Image quality and contrast are consistently excellent. And their latest model also features outstanding video functions.

And their Dual Pixel autofocus is always fast and reliable. You can’t go wrong with a Canon DSLR or mirrorless camera.

Sony

Sony is a mirrorless camera specialist. They don’t make DSLR camera models. But their range of mirrorless cameras at all levels is second to none.

Sony didn’t start producing their cameras until 1988. And they were never heavily invested in DSLR cameras.

But in 2006, it acquired Minolta, a camera company with a long history of making SLRs. After this, Sony turned their focus to mirrorless cameras.

At the beginning of the decade, Sony took risks by launching the Alpha series. This was a full frame mirrorless series. The a7 series evolved with a long list of features and stirred up the professional market.

The Sony full frame line now consists of two different series—the a7 and the a9. The a9 is aimed at sports and wildlife photographers as a direct competitor to the Canon 1D series and the D5.

Sony cameras with the R in the name have a higher-resolution sensor. Those with an S are designed for low light and video shooting. And cameras without any letter add-ons are designed with relatively affordable features.

Sony is also the world’s largest supplier of image sensors. But camera brands don’t always like to share who made the sensor.

You might buy a camera with a different brand name and end up with a Sony sensor. (Like on the newer Nikon models.) But that’s okay because Sony makes great sensors.

Sony Mirrorless Cameras

Sony hasn’t been around as long as Canon and Nikon. But they have some of the best mirrorless camera systems on the market.

The a7 series is now in its fifth generation. And there is a Sony a9 II out. The former is aimed at enthusiasts. The latter is more for sem-professionals.

Compared to the EOS R and Nikon Z lineups, Sony has had more time to refine, add features, and create a strong autofocus system.

The Sony a1 is their flagship mirrorless camera. It’s an advanced full frame mirrorless with a 50.1 MP image sensor and 8K video recording. It’s packed with other high-tech features. And it’s aimed at professional photographers and videographers.

Then there’s the Sony a7R V. This is another trailblazer in the mirrorless camera division. The 61 MP image sensor is out of this world. That’s unparalleled image production for a full frame camera. And the results are breathtaking.

Sony’s APS-C line is also fantastic. Of course, you don’t get the headline-stealing resolutions. But the Sony a6600 is a brilliant mirrorless camera. It produces fantastic photos and videos.

Sony also has some compact cameras you should know about. The Sony ZV-E10 is compact and portable. And Sony designed it for vloggers and content creators. It has excellent video features for such a small camera.

And the Sony RX100 VII is one of the most advanced compact cameras you can find.

Sony’s native lens options are a bit limited compared to Canon’s and Nikon’s. That’s changing as Sony camera systems grow in popularity. Third-party manufacturers offer all their lenses for Sony E-mount.

You can only use certain lenses with Sony mirrorless cameras like Fujifilm cameras. Their short flange distance allows for greater flexibility in lens design.

Which Is Better: Nikon, Canon, or Sony?

Each camera brand has some quirks. But Canon, Nikon, and Sony all make great camera systems. The best part about the Nikon vs Canon vs Sony debate? The constant competition has each camera manufacturer pushing to launch the best new camera.

One year, it may be a Canon, the next a Nikon, and the next a Sony. It all depends on the individual camera. Photographers often prefer one camera system over the other.

But when viewing the photos side by side, no one can tell if you shot that image with a Canon, Nikon, or Sony. A camera is just a tool. The photographer using that tool matters more.

Conclusion: Nikon vs Canon vs Sony

If you’re ready to buy a new camera but aren’t sure yet what brand to choose, here’s what you should do. Go to a store that sells camera systems and ask to shoot with the ones on display. (Or rent a camera body from each brand.)

Then ask yourself how they feel in your hands. Does working with one feel easier or more natural than the other? Dig into the menu systems. Does one brand feel more intuitive to you than the other?

Then look at their lens selection. Can you see yourself using them? How expensive are they? Give yourself time to make the best decision. And after you find your perfect camera and lens, hone your skills with our Photography for Beginners course!

Helpful Training

Quick Capture Cheat Sheets

Trying to decide between Nikon vs Canon vs Sony? Our Cheat Sheets will help you master 52 different aspects of photography, making it easier to compare and choose the best brand for you.

Shop  Offers

Check price on 

Buy from 

Unavailable

Grip count / Just about the photo / G-Foto.

>

Just about a photo

Lately we have heard that it makes no sense to switch to full-frame cameras due to the fact that
The depth of field (the boundary of the sharply depicted space) is the same, well, or almost the same as on cropped cameras.
After all, before people were chasing bokeh (background blur) and tried to take a full frame, but now it turned out that the depth of field
the same both on the crop and on the full frame. Is it so?

Enter data in form

Camera crop factor:
11.31.51.622.7467.68.6
Diaphragm:
1.21.41.822.52.83.544.55.66.37.1811162232
Lens focal length:

mm

Distance to object:

m

circle of confusion: 0 mm
Far edge of field
0 m
near edge of field
0 m
IPIG
0 m
hyperfocal distance
0 m

The depth of field calculation is not only useful, but necessary, we need to know what space will be in sharpness,
and which one is not for shooting a portrait to blur the background behind it. Also, for shooting nature, we must learn to shoot
in hyperfocal, that is, in a mode where everything, everything in general, is in sharpness. Here the formula for calculating the depth of field is also useful.

In the formula for calculating the depth of field, there really are no parameters for camera matrices,
but only the focusing distance, the focal length of the lens, the aperture value and the diameter of the circle of dispersion.
So, if this is the case, then that cropped cameras, that full-matrix, that medium format will blur the background in the same way,
if they are given the same shooting conditions.

Is it true? Indeed, there are no matrix sizes directly in the formula.

But looking closer, we find a parameter that directly depends on the matrices of cameras – this is the absolute focal length of the lens.
That is why in our depth of field calculation form, the first item is the Crop factor of the camera.

That is, if we shoot a portrait of a person on a full frame from a distance of 2 meters and a 50 mm lens, then with a “crop 1. 6″ we need to shoot, either
move away at a distance of 3.2 meters from the subject, or change the lens to 35 mm, that is, the lens is 1.6 times smaller focal length,
to achieve the same position of the subject as it was in full frame.

If we move away from the subject, this will directly change the depth of field, it will become larger.

But we can not move away from the subject, but take a 35 mm lens, but then to achieve the same depth of field, you need to open the aperture wider by 1.6 times.
If it was on a full frame /2.0 with a 50mm lens, then on a “crop in 1.6” we already need /1.4 with a 35mm lens.

As you can see, on the crop you can still have the same depth of field at the same frame as on the full frame. It seems to be proven
that it makes no sense to buy a full frame, you can achieve the same depth of field on crop. Opponents of full frame clap their hands?

However, problems start when the aperture is open at /1.4 at full frame,
in this case, the crop can no longer repeat the size of the depth of field, since there is no 35mm f / 1. 0 lens, it basically does not exist.

X Close

IPIG calculation formula

  • R1 – front boundary of the depth of field;
  • R2 – rear border of the depth of field;
  • R – focusing distance;
  • ƒ – absolute focal length of the lens;
  • K – aperture value;
  • z – diameter of the circle of scattering.

DOF = R2 – R1

As you can see, there is R in the formula – focusing distance – this is exactly the same, if we move away from the subject, R will increase.
As can be seen from the formula, in this case, the depth of field will become larger.

There is one more parameter z – the diameter of the scatter circle, it also changes from the size of the matrix. On full-matrix cameras, its value is 0.03 mm.

z = 0.03 / Camera crop factor

As you can see from the formula on cropped cameras, the diameter of the circle of scattering will be smaller, since the pixel size becomes smaller by crop, this allows you to reduce the depth of field.

But still, this does not save cropped cameras, they have more depth of field than on full-matrix cameras.
For “crop 1.5” the diameter of the circle of dispersion will be 0.02 mm, and for “crop 1.6” it will be 0.019mm.

Let’s calculate the depth of field for the conditions: we shoot a portrait on a full frame with a 50 mm lens and an aperture of / 1.2 from a distance of 3 meters.

We substitute all the values ​​in meters into the formula, which means that a 50 mm lens will become 0.05 m. The diameter of a circle of scattering of 0.03 mm will become 0.00003 m.

R1 = 3 * 0.052 / (0.052 + 1.2*(3-0.05)*0.00003 ) = 2.877 m

R2 = 3 * 0.052 / (0.052 – 1.2*(3-0.05)*0.00003 ) = 3.133 m

DOF = R2 – R1 = 0.256 m

What happened: focused from a distance of 3 meters, got a sharp picture within (2.877…3.133) m., and, as a result: 25.6 centimeters of sharp space.

And now the same portrait, but on a “crop 1.6” with the same lens and the same aperture, but now you have to move away to a distance of 4. 8 m to get the same frame. ƒ will be equal to 50 * 1.6 = 80 mm,
the diameter of the scatter circle will be 0.03 / 1.6 = 0.019 mm.

R1 = 4.8 * 0.082 / (0.082 + 1.2*(4.8-0.08)*0.000019 ) = 4.603 m

R2 = 4.8 * 0.082 / (0.082 – 1.2*(4.8-0.08)*0.000019 ) = 5.014 m

DOF = R2 – R1 = 0.411 m

What happened: in order to get the same frame, we retreated to a distance of 4.8 meters, focused from this distance, got a sharp picture in
within (4.603 … 5.014) m., and, as a result: 41.1 centimeters of sharp space.

As you can see, the depth of field on the crop has grown by 15.5 centimeters or by 61%.


Well, let’s take a look at the case when the lens is changed, but they do not move away from the subject. Same parameters, but now let’s take a 35 f/1.4 crop lens

On “crop 1.6” we shoot with a 35 f / 1.4 lens, aperture / 1.4, distance 3 m, there will be the same frame. ƒ will be equal to 35 * 1.6 = 56 mm,
the diameter of the scatter circle will be 0. 03 / 1.6 = 0.019 mm.

R1 = 3 * 0.0562 / (0.082 + 1.4*(3-0.056)*0.000019) = 2.82 m

R2 = 3 * 0.0562 / (0.082 – 1.4*(3-0.056)*0.000019 ) = 3.203 m

DOF = R2 – R1 = 0.383 m

What happened: we did not go anywhere, but changed the lens and got the same frame, focused from a distance of 3 meters, got a sharp picture in
within (2.82 … 3.203) m., and, as a result: 38.3 centimeters of sharp space.

As you can see, the depth of field on the crop has grown by 12.7 centimeters or 50%.

This is one of the parameters that causes people to switch to full frame, although there are
lenses are more expensive, and camera bodies themselves are sometimes just as expensive.

Conclusion: the full frame is interesting only if
if you use lenses with aperture 1.2 – 1.4, then the advantage over crop is revealed.
If you do not use such lenses, then it makes no sense to buy a full frame, indeed, depth of field on crop
can be the same or even better than on FF. And yet, perhaps someone will not notice such a slight increase
The depth of field on the crop, only 10-15 centimeters, which is shown here in the example. In this case, it also makes no sense to buy FF.

But personally, I don’t have enough depth of field anymore, when I shoot on a crop with a 35 mm lens and at an open aperture of f / 1.4, I still feel
what is not such a blur after shooting with the same lens on the FF.

Hyperfocal distance

is the distance beyond which all objects are in focus.

X Close

Hyperfocal

  • ƒ – absolute focal length of the lens;
  • K – aperture value;
  • z – diameter of the circle of scattering.

G is the Hyperfocal distance.

Having found it, we focus on the object of this distance and everything behind it will be in focus, and in front of it at half this distance.

For example, full frame, 15 mm lens with /8 aperture. In this case, z (diameter of the scatter circle) is equal to 0. 03 mm, as mentioned above.

G = 0.0152 / 8 * 0.00003 = 0.9375 m

That is, the hyperfocal in this case is 1 meter. We find a stone 1 meter from us, focus on it, and everything that is further than a meter in focus and that’s it,
which is closer by 50 cm is also in focus. That is, we put aside half of the hyperfocal and back.

Previous
Next

Page:
1

Add message

anonymous

Quote:
But looking closer, we find a parameter that directly depends on the matrices of cameras – this is the absolute focal length of the lens. That is why in our depth of field calculation form, the first item is the Crop factor of the camera.

you have confused with the equivalent focal length.

In fact, when changing from full frame to crop, the flu will not change if everything else remains the same. But you may well want to go further. But the distance is already in the formula

Answer: maybe…

Page:
1

Current page: 1

Total messages: 1

iPhone 12 Pro vs. Canon EOS R camera comparison – which is better?

Last year we compared the iPhone 11 Pro camera to the $7500 Canon 1DX Mark II professional camera and thought it couldn’t get any better. But this year, Apple introduced the new iPhone 12 Pro mobile shooting flagship and it became interesting: is it good enough to compare with the Canon EOS R professional camera?

In order not to beat around the bush – the first pictures for comparison. The first photo shows an example of a photo taken with the iPhone 12 Pro’s ultra-wide lens, while the second photo is taken with the Canon EOS R.

What’s the difference? The first thing that catches your eye is, of course, the capture of the sky. In its usual style, the iPhone 12 Pro made the sky natural, displayed the sky on the eve of a snow storm, when the Canon EOS R, due to focusing (most likely), did not catch this mood and natural colors. Regarding the sharpness of the photos, most likely, the Canon EOS R did better, but due to the naturalness of the picture, the photo taken on the iPhone 12 Pro is more pleasing to the eye. I would say that a photo taken on the Canon EOS R is already such a finished magazine shot that you can not process it at all when I would still work on the first shot of the iPhone 12 Pro in Lightroom to bring it to the “ideal”.

In the second photo, I would like to draw your attention to the highlights that are clearly visible in the Canon EOS R shot. Poorly set manual mode, if you are not a pro, can lead to such unpleasant formations as blowouts. It is easier to work with the camera on the iPhone 12 Pro in this regard, because in order to get rid of highlights, we simply focus the camera on the brightest place or easily adjust the exposure in the settings. Visually, it seems that the shot taken on the iPhone 12 Pro is better, but in terms of contrast, the Canon EOS R still did a better job here.0014

As for the third pair of shots, it’s hard to pick a clear winner in this round. As you can see, the first shot taken with the Canon EOS R is again blown out. Perhaps for someone this is not so important, but if you want to get a really high-quality picture, this should be avoided, otherwise the photo loses its naturalness. However, the Canon EOS R did a better job with contrasting color, focusing on the model’s face.

The iPhone 12 Pro is a little different. The elements around the model are very well worked out here, however, the model itself did not receive accent light on the face, from which you will have to edit and “pull” the light in the editor. The colors of the photo taken on the iPhone 12 Pro let us down this time, I think the Canon EOS R did a little better in this regard.

The iPhone 12 Pro’s standard (wide-angle) camera lens is just as good as the Canon EOS R. Despite the fact that the photos were taken in the same conditions, we see completely different pictures.

The iPhone 12 Pro in this case did an incredibly good job with the details in the background, perfectly displayed colors and sharpness. When the Canon EOS R camera, focusing on the model, lost the background. Depending on where you want to use the shot, the perception of the winner in this round also changes. But I would rather give the iPhone 12 Pro primacy, because we can blur the background in any editor, but returning the blur to normal is already an hour’s work in Photoshop.

Another example of a snapshot that is difficult for me to appreciate is shown below. On the one hand, we see the incredible work on the details of the iPhone 12 Pro, and on the other hand, it was in this shot that the accents were correctly placed in the Canon EOS R.

meets with rich black. Such a trifle “cheapens” the photo, so it needs to be removed in the editor. However, the Canon EOS R did a very poor job of displaying the sign and the sky above, it just faded into blur and white when the iPhone 12 Pro showed us both the sky and crisp neon lights.

In terms of telephoto and optical zoom, I won’t lie – a professional camera will win. Because you can use an additional lens and thus increase your chances in this fight.

But in terms of portrait shooting, the iPhone 12 Pro did really well. Just look at how he worked on blurring and how clearly he highlighted the model’s leg in the photo.

In this picture, I would say that the cameras just erased the boundaries. The image quality of the professional Canon EOS R and iPhone 12 Pro is almost the same.

As you can see in the photo above, the time has come when the mobile camera of the iPhone 12 Pro is practically in no way inferior to overall professional cameras like the Canon EOS R. I think that this has been tried to be proved by Apple for several years, and they have it works out great, judging by the number of professional photographers who now shoot on the iPhone.