Logitech Keys-to-Go Ultra Slim Keyboard
$69.95
BluePinkBlack
Color
Need some help?
Contact us.
(Opens in a new window)
-
Product Information
Overview
Logitech Keys-To-Go is an ultra-portable, lightweight bluetooth keyboard for your iPad, iPhone, or Apple TV. Enjoy comfortable typing on soft silent keys and a full row of iOS shortcut keys that provide one-tap access to volume controls, media controls, and more. The keyboard is wrapped in a durable, easy-to-clean FabricSkin that seals in the keys, protecting them from spills, crumbs, and dirt. Keys-To-Go allows you to break free and work anywhere in your house or on the go with a long battery life that can last up to 3 months on a single charge*.
It also includes a handy iPhone stand that keeps your phone propped up at a comfortable angle when you want to type.
Highlights
Ultra-portable wireless Bluetooth keyboard for iPhone, iPad, and Apple TV
Fits easily in a backpack, purse, or briefcase
Durable, easy-to-clean Fabric Skin seals in the keyboard, protecting it from spills, crumbs, and dirt
Comfortable typing thanks to well-spaced, soft and silent keys
Full row of iOS shortcuts for one tap access to media controls, volume controls, and more
Long battery life that can go up to 3 months on a single charge (based on 2 hours daily use)
Handy iPhone stand for typing on the go
What’s in the Box
Logitech Keys-to-Go keyboard
iPhone/iPad stand
USB cable
Documentation
Tech Specs
Form Factor: Ultra-Thin
Cable Length: 15.
7 in. / 40 cm
Connections: USB, Wireless
Batteries: Built-in Rechargeable
Height: 0.24 in. / 0.6 cm
Length: 9.53 in. / 24.2 cm
Width: 5.39 in. / 13.7 cm
Weight: 6.35 oz. / 180 g
-
Compatibility
iPhone Models
- iPhone 14 Pro
- iPhone 14 Pro Max
- iPhone 14
- iPhone 14 Plus
- iPhone 13 Pro
- iPhone 13 Pro Max
- iPhone 13 mini
- iPhone 13
- iPhone 12 Pro
- iPhone 12 Pro Max
- iPhone 12 mini
- iPhone 12
- iPhone 11 Pro
- iPhone 11 Pro Max
- iPhone 11
- iPhone SE (2nd generation)
- iPhone XS
- iPhone XS Max
- iPhone XR
- iPhone X
- iPhone 8
- iPhone 8 Plus
- iPhone 7
- iPhone 7 Plus
- iPhone 6s
- iPhone 6s Plus
- iPhone 6
- iPhone 6 Plus
- iPhone SE (1st generation)
iPad Models
-
iPad Pro 12.
9-inch (6th generation)
- iPad Pro 12.9-inch (4th generation)
- iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation)
- iPad Pro 12.9-inch (2nd generation)
- iPad Pro 12.9-inch (1st generation)
- iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation)
- iPad Pro 11-inch (2nd generation)
- iPad Pro 11-inch (1st generation)
-
iPad Pro 10.
5-inch
- iPad Pro 9.7-inch
- iPad Air (4th generation)
- iPad Air (3rd generation)
- iPad Air 2
- iPad Air (1st generation)
- iPad (10th generation)
- iPad (9th generation)
- iPad (8th generation)
- iPad (7th generation)
- iPad (6th generation)
- iPad (5th generation)
- iPad mini (6th generation)
- iPad mini (5th generation)
- iPad mini 4
- iPad mini 3
- iPad mini 2
- iPad mini (1st generation)
Mac Models
- MacBook Air (M1, 2020)
- MacBook Air (Retina, 13‑inch, 2020)
- MacBook Air (Retina, 13-inch, 2018 – 2019)
- MacBook Air (13-inch, Early 2015 – 2017)
- MacBook Air (11-inch, Early 2015)
- MacBook Pro (13-inch, M1, 2020)
- MacBook Pro (13-inch, 2020)
- MacBook Pro (13-inch, 2016 – 2019)
- MacBook Pro (Retina, 13-inch, Late 2012 – 2015)
- MacBook Pro (16-inch, 2019)
- MacBook Pro (15-inch, 2016 – 2019)
- MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Mid 2012 – 2015)
- MacBook (Retina, 12-inch, Early 2015 – 2017)
-
iMac (Retina 4K, 21.
5‑inch, 2019)
- iMac (Retina 4K, 21.5-inch, 2017)
- iMac (Retina 4K, 21.5-inch, Late 2015)
- iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, 2019–2020)
- iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, 2017)
- iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, Late 2014 – 2015)
- iMac Pro (2017)
- Mac mini (M1, 2020)
- Mac mini (2018)
- Mac Pro (2019)
Apple TV Models
- Apple TV 4K (1st generation)
- Apple TV HD
- Apple TV (3rd generation)
- Apple TV (2nd generation)
\n
\n
Need some help?
\n\n\n\tContact us. \n\t(Opens in a new window)\n\n
Logitech Keys-To-Go Review – RTINGS.com
Tested using
Methodology v1.0
Reviewed Jan 20, 2020 at 09:11 am
Latest change: Retest Oct 28, 2021 at 04:17 pm
By Antoine Laforge, Jean-Simon Bonneterre, and Olivier Gariepy
4.7
Gaming
8.5
Mobile/Tablet
6.0
Office
4.9
Programming
4.6
Entertainment / HTPC
overview
test results
deals
discussions
Size
Compact (65%)
Connectivity
Wireless
Mechanical
No
The Logitech Keys-To-Go is a very small keyboard that is great to bring around when traveling. It offers a more tactile feel than typing on a phone or tablet, but doesn’t quite compare to a typical typing keyboard. The keys have a very small travel distance, meaning it’s quite easy to make typos. On the upside, it feels rather well-built thanks to the nice rubber coating and it’s one of the quietest options available.
Our Verdict
4.7
Gaming
The Logitech Keys-To-Go isn’t designed for gaming. It takes a lot of force to actuate the keys, and the latency is quite high. On top of that, it lacks backlighting and macro-programmable keys.
Cons
-
Can only lay flat; no ergonomic design.
-
Mediocre typing quality.
-
High latency.
-
No programmable keys.
-
No backlighting.
See our Gaming Recommendations
8.5
Mobile/Tablet
The Logitech Keys-To-Go is a great mobile keyboard. It connects to your devices via Bluetooth and allows for a better tactile typing than on the touchscreen of your phone or tablet. It’s very portable due to its small size and lightweight design. Unfortunately, you can’t connect it to multiple devices. You also need to buy the right variant for your device, as there are variants for Apple devices, and another for Windows/Android.
Pros
-
Travel-friendly design.
-
Can be used via Bluetooth on any platform.
-
Excellent compatibility with various operating systems.
Cons
-
Can only lay flat; no ergonomic design.
-
Mediocre typing quality.
6.0
Office
The Logitech Keys-To-Go is a mediocre office keyboard. Its typing quality is quite sub-par due to the rubber dome switches and is quite typo-prone. On the upside, it’s very quiet, but shouldn’t really be used for typing during a full day at work.
Pros
-
Very quiet keyboard.
-
Can be used via Bluetooth on any platform.
-
Excellent compatibility with various operating systems.
Cons
-
Can only lay flat; no ergonomic design.
-
Mediocre typing quality.
See our Office Recommendations
4.9
Programming
The Logitech Keys-To-Go isn’t designed to be a programming keyboard. It’s hard and uncomfortable to type on because the layout feels cramped, and its scissor switches require a lot of force to actuate. Also, it lacks a multi-device pairing feature and macro-programmable keys.
Pros
-
Can be used via Bluetooth on any platform.
-
Excellent compatibility with various operating systems.
Cons
-
Can only lay flat; no ergonomic design.
-
Mediocre typing quality.
-
No programmable keys.
-
No backlighting.
See our Programming Recommendations
4.6
Entertainment / HTPC
The Logitech Keys-To-Go is bad for use with a home theater PC. Even though it has wireless connectivity, it doesn’t have a trackpad, so you’ll need a separate mouse. Also, there’s no backlighting, which makes it hard to see the keys in the dark.
Pros
-
Can be used via Bluetooth on any platform.
-
Excellent compatibility with various operating systems.
Cons
-
Can only lay flat; no ergonomic design.
-
Mediocre typing quality.
-
No backlighting.
-
4.
7
Gaming
-
8.5
Mobile/Tablet
-
6.0
Office
-
4.9
Programming
-
4.
6
Entertainment / HTPC
+ Create your own
-
Updated Oct 28, 2021:
Changed the size from 60% to 65%. -
Updated Feb 04, 2021:
Converted to Test Bench 1.0. -
Updated Jan 20, 2020:
Review published.
Check Price
Black, Android/Windows
Searching
Finding Store
Black, iOS
Searching
Finding Store
iOS, Blush Pink
Searching
Finding Store
iOS, Smoke Blue
Searching
Finding Store
SEE CURRENT DEALS AND PRICE TREND
Differences Between Sizes And Variants
Some Logitech Keys-To-Go are compatible with Android/Windows while others are fully compatible with Apple devices that run on iOS or iPadOS. We expect our review to be valid for both variants, but make sure to buy the right one for your devices.
Compared To Other Keyboards
The Logitech Keys-To-Go is an excellent portable keyboard due to its compact size and Bluetooth support. However, it provides a sub-par typing experience and lacks a multi-device pairing feature, which the Logitech K380 has. For more options, check out our recommendations for the best wireless keyboards, the best iPad keyboards, and the best cheap keyboards.
Searching
Finding Store
Overall, the Logitech K380 is a much better keyboard than the Logitech Keys-To-Go. The K380 is more comfortable to type on, and its switches require a lot less force to actuate, providing a significantly better typing experience. Also, it has multi-device pairing and is compatible with Logitech’s Options software for customization. On the other hand, the Keys-To-Go has a better build quality and a built-in rechargeable battery, whereas the K380 uses disposable batteries. The K380’s latency is lower, but it’s still not recommended for gaming.
Searching
Finding Store
The Logitech Keys-To-Go is a better option than the Logitech K480 if you’re looking for a lightweight keyboard to bring around. It’s noticeably smaller and lighter than the K480, but it can only be paired to one device at a time, while the K480 can be paired to three simultaneously. The Keys-To-Go is also rechargeable, while the K480 uses two AAA batteries. On the other hand, the Keys-To-Go has a very poor typing experience as the keys are mushy and require a lot of force to actuate.
Searching
Finding Store
The Apple Magic Keyboard 2017 is much better than the Logitech Keys-To-Go for most uses, although the Logitech is meant more as a portable keyboard for mobile devices. The Apple provides a significantly better typing experience because it requires a lot less force to operate the keys and gives more satisfying tactile feedback. Also, it has better build quality and is more comfortable to type on. That said, the Apple keyboard isn’t compatible with Android devices.
Searching
Finding Store
The Fintie Soft TPU Keyboard Case For iPad 7th Gen is a much better keyboard than the Logitech Keys-To-Go. The typing quality is much better and the ergonomics are significantly better. The Logitech has a much better build quality and it’s fully compatible with macOS, while a few keys on the Fintie don’t work on macOS.
Searching
Finding Store
The iClever Tri-Folding Keyboard BK08 is a better keyboard for mobile devices and tablets than the Logitech Keys-To-Go. Its unique folding design is more portable, although it doesn’t feel as durable as the Logitech’s design. On the other hand, the iClever has a trackpad and can be connected to three different Bluetooth devices. Its keys also offer a slightly better typing experience than the Logitech.
Searching
Finding Store
The AmazonBasics K4R is a better office keyboard than Logitech Keys-To-Go, which is better suited for mobile devices thanks to its Bluetooth connection. The feedback of the AmazonBasics switches is better and will be more similar to typical keyboards, while the rubberized keycaps of the Logitech are harder to press down.
Searching
Finding Store
The Brydge 10.2 Keyboard for Apple iPad is a much better keyboard than the Logitech Keys-To-Go. It has a much better typing experience, build quality, and ergonomics. It also has white backlighting for use in dark environments. The Logitech is lighter to carry around, and it’s nearly silent when you’re typing on it, perfect for use in a cafe or a library.
+ Show more
Test Results
Sort Category───────────RATINGSGamingMobile/TabletOfficeProgrammingEntertainment / HTPC
Category AllDesignTyping ExperienceSoftware and Operating System
Design
Size
Compact (65%)
Height
0.2″ (0.6 cm)
Width
9.5″ (24.2 cm)
Depth
5. 4″ (13.7 cm)
Depth With Wrist Rest
N/A
Weight
0.41 lbs (0.186 kg)
Update 10/28/2021: We changed the size from 60% to 65% because it has arrow keys.
The Logitech Keys-To-Go, like its name suggests, is a very small and portable option that is easy to bring around. It’s one of the smallest keyboards we’ve tested so far.
Keycap Material
Rubber
Although the Logitech Keys-To-Go is small and thin, it’s fairly well-built. The keyboard is covered by a rubber coating and it feels very lightweight. While the coating feels durable enough, the edges might wear off prematurely.
Board Design
Straight
Minimum Incline
0°
Medium Incline
N/A
Maximum Incline
N/A
Wrist Rest
No
This keyboard isn’t made to have an ergonomic design. It lays completely flat and there’s no incline setting or any wrist rest.
Backlighting
No
Color
No Backlighting
Individually Backlit Keys
No
Color Mixing
No Backlighting
Effects
No
Programmable
No
The keyboard doesn’t have any backlighting options. It won’t be ideal to type on in low-light situations. If you’re looking for a mobile keyboard with backlighting, then check out the Brydge 10.2 Keyboard for Apple iPad.
Connectivity
Wireless
Detachable
Yes (Charge Only)
Length
1.3 ft (0.4 m)
Connector (Keyboard side)
Micro USB
The only cable the keyboard has is a short micro-USB charging cable.
Bluetooth
Yes
Bluetooth Multi-Device Pairing
No
Proprietary Receiver
No
Battery Type
Rechargeable
This keyboard connects wirelessly to your source via Bluetooth. You can check your battery status with the battery button in the top right corner and recharge it with the included micro-USB cable. The manufacturer advertises a 3-month battery life if typing 2 hours on a daily basis. If you need a multi-device pairing feature, check out the Logitech K380.
Media Keys
Dedicated
Macro Programmable Keys
No
Trackpad / Trackball
No
Wheel
No
USB Passthrough
No
Numpad
No
Windows Key Lock
No
Lock Indicator
No Indicator
This keyboard has very few extra features. It has dedicated media keys on the top row of the keyboard right above the numbers row, but unfortunately, you can’t program keys to what you want, which is very disappointing. On the upside, there are also home, screenshot, quick search, and app switch buttons on the left of the media keys.
- Logitech Keys-To-Go keyboard
- Phone holder
- USB-A to Micro-USB charging cable
- Manuals
Typing Experience
Key Switches
Rubber Dome
Mechanical
No
Feel
Tactile
Operating Force
90 gf
Actuation Force
81 gf
Pre-Travel
1.1 mm
Total Travel
1.5 mm
The Logitech Keys-To-Go’s rubber dome switches have very minimal travel. The keys have a small bump near the actuation point, but they feel a bit mushy, and doesn’t give great feedback as to when a key is pressed. If you prefer more typical keycaps that don’t require as much force, check out the Logitech K480.
Typing on the Logitech Keys-To-Go feels sub-par. Although the rubber finish feels nice, the keys are hard to press and don’t offer any satisfactory feedback. Also, since the travel needed to register a key is rather low, this keyboard is prone to typos. On the upside, the keys feel stable but can be tiring during long periods of writing. If you want a Bluetooth keyboard that has a better overall typing experience, check out the AmazonBasics K4R or the Fintie Soft TPU Keyboard Case For iPad 7th Gen.
Noise
Very Quiet
This keyboard is near silent when typing on it. It’s one of the quietest keyboards we’ve reviewed so far.
Latency Wired
N/A
Latency Receiver
N/A
Latency Bluetooth
28. 5 ms
The latency is fairly high. It should be fine for general typing, but it’s not recommended for gaming.
Software and Operating System
Software Name
No Software
Account Required
No Software
Profiles
No Profile
Onboard Memory
No
Cloud Sync
No
Macro Programming
No
Ease Of Use
No Software
Software Windows Compatible
No
Software macOS Compatible
No
There’s no dedicated compatible software for customization options.
Windows
Partial
macOS
Full
Linux
Partial
Android
Partial
iOS
Full
iPadOS
Full
Overall, this keyboard has great compatibility. It connects to your source via Bluetooth and can be used on any platform. However, some macOS shortcuts can’t be used on Windows, Linux, and Android. Note that there are Apple and Android/Windows model variants of this keyboard. You must choose your preferred variant depending on your own devices. Our unit was Apple-compatible.
A case of how we gathered under four hundred Russian “security guards” for an IS competition – Marketing on vc.ru
This is a very gray-haired story from the distant 2013, but we just ran out of NDA, so I would like to tell it. So, it was necessary to help Croc organize the largest cybersecurity competition in Russia – the Cyber Challenge. This is when a warm company of information security specialists gathers and breaks the infrastructure simulator of a large company. Everything is like in the real world, only no one will sit down, and the winner must show a passport in order to receive a prize.
490
views
There was only one problem: where to get the security guards, who will obviously participate in the corporate theme?
We solved this story with content marketing. Specifically, posts on Habré about how information security is done in the real world, and what real problems are there. Each post gave 20-50 registrations. But the coolest one was with the RAR quest. He gave more than a hundred registrations for the first round.
Actually, here is the post:
Speaker – Dina Burkhanshina – a person who was directly responsible for organizing the tournament in Russia. The post, as you can see, scored 48.9thousand views, and in the first half hour – 3500 views. This is a very, very, very rare result for Habr in 2013: perhaps only a couple of posts in a year can boast of this only on organic content.
A RAR quest is an archive that contains an archive that contains an archive and so on — we had 12 such “matryoshkas”. These archives are password-protected, and in order to go deeper, you need to do some kind of task that lies at your level.
Habré already had a lot of similar “archived” quests, but they did not gain popularity. As you can see, ours was 20-50 times better than the examples from the SERP in terms of coverage:
First of all, we didn’t have tasks, but a cool plot. You “played” as a hacker who received an order. And this story took into account all the folklore of the IT environment, because it was written with a very deep understanding of how the process takes place.
Secondly, the first levels were completed in a matter of minutes and gave the feeling that you were already deep in the story. Your primary target was the “oak” from the guard, and it was tritely interesting to crack it.
Here are examples of unpacking:
Thirdly, there is a lot of local humor here. For example, at that time it was fashionable to sign letters “take care of nature, do not print this letter”. Here is the next level of the quest:
Everything is much more interesting here. Of course, it’s easy for you to steal the garbage bag that John left outside. There you find three alpha-shot paper targets, a hamburger wrapper, an empty packet of Crispy beans, and a slightly rumpled Playboy number. Plus a letter, printed on a printer, with which the magazine was laid. “John, no, I don’t advise you to keep the same password, damn it. Come up with something longer than 4 digits, at least eight, you are the head of the SECURITY department. P.S. Please protect the environment and do not print this letter.”
Date is the day before yesterday. So John must have already changed his password.
And so on.
We also had empty steps and branches: this is an uncharacteristic development of an archive quest. That is, it was possible not just to fall through deeper levels, but somewhere it was almost instantaneous (perceived as a small reward), and somewhere the archives were invested in several pieces at once, and some may simply end in a dead end and a bummer. This is realism, in the process it happens. Another important thing is that we sometimes used data that was a few steps back, but was not yet useful. They could be useful below, which was not obvious to everyone.
Fourthly, to answer 80% of the problems you do not need to have special skills: common sense and a little math are enough. We make entry very, very easy. And due to the fact that many passwords are “significant” for the community, the community begins to play the game together, sharing their versions of what to do next in the comments.
This snowballed our reach. Needless to say, we didn’t expect this.
Fifth, the last levels are really hard. We need them to get those who are able to pass them quickly. That is, welcome guests at the competition.
The quest ends with a plot. That is, according to the plot of the game, you receive an invitation at the end. Moreover, everything counts, because the last task is to send a letter to a real mail, this is the end of a short love line:
If you want to stay with EDC, send an email to [email protected]. If you want to warn Alexandra, please send a blank email to [email protected]. Before you make a decision, you want to drop by home and check your email (after all, you didn’t take a single personal device with you to work). You make a couple of circles around the city, get rid of your phone and SIM card, put a TV tuner and other hardware in a box in a supermarket just in case, and only after that you go to your place. The first thing that surprises you is the messages on your phone. This is information about a significant increase in the bank account and a couple of unanswered ones from your friends in IT, whom you have not seen for a couple of years. After checking the mail, the situation becomes clearer: for some reason, EDC decided to close the contract on its part and sent you a thank you for your work. Plus invited me to meet with their specialist to discuss the next contract in July.
July seems to be more than successful. Now you have a few hours to warn Alexandra. If, of course, you want. New contracts can be viewed here.
The winners received the following letters:
Hello!
You were one of the first to pass this simple test, congratulations!
If you’d like to participate in the Symantec Cyber Readiness Challenge, Russia’s first individual hacker tournament, we’ll make priority registration for you. This means that no matter how many people are registered for the tournament, you (or your friend, whose login you will send) will be guaranteed to take part in the online part.
Well, are you ready to take part in the confrontation between two giants of the space industry – EDC and RKI corporations? The online game will take place very soon, July 15-19. Registration is available at http://www.croc.ru/c2/ If you want to use priority registration, just send your login to [email protected].
And, of course, we were very interested in what you choose at the last step 🙂
0003
The plot (the shortest thread) is here: https://habr.com/ru/company/croc/blog/184742/#comment_6431236
This post did another important thing: the speaker got the right to talk about information security in the community. And then there was a successful series, for example, here is the second post for the event: https://habr.com/ru/company/croc/blog/185370/
Why? Because I wanted to make a cool thing “for my own”, which is valuable in itself as entertainment.
The result of is 450 letters 48 hours after the quest was posted (then we considered it to be fully completed, and half of the received messages passed somewhere in 8 hours). Of these, about 400 are real participants, of which about 100 have registered for the tournament. In total, according to the results of the full campaign (including promotion in CROC social networks), there were about 400 participants in the first round of the tournament.
Free cheese as a generator of conflict in society
Unnamed representatives of the Ministry of Industry and Trade told one of the federal publications that they are studying the introduction of a food sharing program in Russia – free distribution of food with an expiring shelf life. Now it is more profitable for sellers to throw away goods than to give to charity. So, according to the calculations of the department, 17 million tons of food annually “die”. Reaction to the news revealed a high level of distrust towards the idea of a state-controlled food charity.
Why the idea of food sharing against the backdrop of the global food crisis received negative and sarcastic assessments in Russia, explains political observer, political consultant Daria Polyankina.
The Food Sharing program from the Ministry of Industry and Trade is not the first and not the last case of how the relevant department turned out to be off the political agenda and voiced its quite positive idea either in the wrong words or at the wrong time. The source material cited by other publications describes an objectively important issue – it is now cheaper for retailers to throw away products than to give them to those in need. This hinders the development of charity, negatively affects the environment and, in general, is wasteful.
By broadcasting such values, the ministry takes the position of “the only European in Russia,” but it does so at an extremely unfortunate moment. First, with Europe we are now far from a moral consensus. And secondly, in its picture of an imaginary future, the Ministry of Industry and Trade found a place for the economy and environmental protection, but forgot the main character – the Russian. How will he feel and what will he think when the state offers him social support in the form of free products on the verge of delay? And how will this affect his attitude towards public and government institutions?
In fact, food sharing exists in Russia right now. Some of the allegedly discarded goods are actually sent not to a landfill, but to the consumer. On the Internet, it is easy to find videos of people dismantling products from dumpsters behind stores. The picture is often accompanied by emotional comments with the following content: “How terrible it is to live, and what we have all come to.” But in fact, the collection of recycled products in large retail outlets has long turned into an industry with a competitive component. And not only the poor and the needy are participating in this challenge.
By the predetermined hour of taking out the products to the trash, people come to the store in cars. They wait for the employee to lower the boxes into the container, and then in seconds they take them out and sort them out, energetically working with their elbows. In the comments on such videos, people often broadcast the thought: is it really impossible to somehow do without a trash can in this process? You can, for sure! But instead of regulating only this detail, the idea of regulating the entire system of product sharing is being discussed. And add an artificial social component there, limiting the circle of possible recipients to people with low incomes.
If we go this route, food sharing will turn from a voluntary and partly gambling activity, in which people participate at will, to a stigmatization of poverty. A person will have to present some kind of document establishing his right to participate in the program. Who and under what conditions will become an intermediary between the store and the consumer of the sharing service? Will he be able to provide efficient logistics so that the products do not have time to spoil? Will there be limits on the number of items per person? How many will be dissatisfied, underreceived? Expiring food is not a benefit.